RSS

The Hobbit, Second Time Around

08 Jan

The worst moment of Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings films was not when they cut out Tom Bombadil. It wasn’t what he did to Faramir. It was not eliminating the Scouring of the Shire. No—the worst moment in the films was one that a lot of fans liked—when Aragorn sliced off the Mouth of Sauron’s head.

I realize that many people found that moment enormously satisfying. Unfortunately, Tolkien would probably have been furious. According to the rules of civilized warfare, you don’t kill someone during a parley, however strained. And in Middle Earth, the good side follows the rules of civilized warfare. If their morals become muddy in regard to how they fight, they are muddy the entire way around. So I was extremely relieved to find that when, in the second Hobbit movie, an Orc prisoner is killed, it isn’t treated as honorable. Aragorn’s killing was portrayed as justified; Thranduil’s, on the other hand, is bluntly criticized by Legolas.

Let me clarify one thing. I refuse to judge the new movie because it isn’t as “lighthearted” as the book. The Desolation of Smaug is The Hobbit plus The Lord of the Rings appendices. What else do you expect?

The Hobbit

However, I do have a few complaints.

  • The Kili/Tauriel thing. I don’t mind Legolas having a girlfriend (well, much), but a love triangle with two Elves and a Dwarf is just odd.
  • The humor. It’s really junior highish in places. The Hobbit is humorous, all right, but it isn’t this kind of humor.
  • The goofier fight sequences. Legolas hopping from Dwarf head to Dwarf head pushes belief, even for an Elf.
  • Bringing in modern political ideas. Wasn’t there some a way to talk about the Master of Laketown’s selfish rule without mentioning elections and democracy? I’m sure the dialogue sounds funny to the average moviegoer, but that sort of language never shows up in Tolkien—a Tory with anarchist tendencies.

As for what the movie got right:

  • Beorn. He isn’t what I expected, but I look forward to seeing more of him.
  • Bolg the Goblin. According to the Appendices, Azog the Defiler was definitely dead, and I still think that Bolg would have been a sufficient foe for Thorin, without the need to make changes from the book. But at least this is a nod to all the fans who have been whining about Bolg’s replacement by his father.
  • Smaug. The dragon scenes are far more involved than those in the book, but they are necessary, I think, for Smaug to seem sufficiently ferocious on-screen.
  • Bard. Peter Jackson got this one perfect—kids, fish, and all. Willing to stand against the Dwarves for the good of Laketown, Bard is also the only man in Laketown willing to shelter the injured Kili. I look forward to seeing him in the third installment.

Overall impression? The Desolation of Smaug is better, as a movie, than An Unexpected Journey. It also takes more departures from Tolkien’s writings and—more seriously—his viewpoint. I am hesitant to set out a final judgment, however. When the third Hobbit installment comes out, that will be time enough to decide exactly what Peter Jackson has, or has not, accomplished with these films. Film three will be the most difficult in many ways—there is nothing lighthearted or humorous about the Battle of the Five Armies, its preceding events, or most of its aftermath. In that vein, I wish Peter Jackson good luck and sound judgment. He will need both.

Advertisements
 
4 Comments

Posted by on January 8, 2014 in Fantasy

 

Tags: , , , ,

4 responses to “The Hobbit, Second Time Around

  1. A.L. Harris

    January 8, 2014 at 4:16 am

    I agree with most of what you wrote – I didn’t even think about the Aragon chopping off the Mouth of Sauron’s head so that was food for thought. What annoyed me most was probably Kili and Tauriel (and the presumed triangle with Legolas to a certain degree) but I am interested to see what Peter Jackson does with the third movie.

     
    • A. Carroll Crowe

      January 8, 2014 at 4:30 am

      The third movie…yes. How Peter Jackson will manages to kill Fili, Kili, and Thorin without being killed by some of the *cough* fans remains to be seen. But I’m looking forward to it, with the hopes that it will justify the changes thus far.

       
  2. bryanajoy

    February 7, 2014 at 2:28 am

    I also saw this one twice. 🙂 Once in costume with my whole church and once again with just some family members.

    And I think you’re pretty spot-on, although I must add I just can’t make myself like Tauriel AT.ALL. The idiocy of her falling in love with Kili is just the icing on the cake. It’s clear she was inserted in there to shut the feminists up, and that resulted in an unfeminine she-elf, which is just — not right. Even Arwen’s over-inflated role was still womanly. Well, at least, that’s what I think. 🙂

    I was glad you mentioned the annoying modern and stereotypical conversation with the head honchos in laketown, and I also thought Bard was perfect in every way.

    The dragon was good too.

    But. the fire. I mean, really? For a production team that made fire a key theme of the movie, and even the central element of the theme song, they didn’t seem to understand its properties very well. The point is that it BURNS things up, and if a dragon can breath a furnace at you without leaving you with so much as a blister, something is wrong. With the dragon. Of course, we know from the first movie that these dwarves are awfully durable 🙂

     
    • A. Carroll Crowe

      February 10, 2014 at 4:19 pm

      I think I was a little more accustomed to the dwarves’…ahem…durability during this movie. The first movie I was expecting something a little more like “The Lord of the Rings,” so the Goblin-town sequences left me with eyebrows raised. I didn’t think as much about the fire, although I do remember noticing that Bilbo didn’t have the back side of his head singed, as I think he did in the book. The hopping on heads was what really stood out to me as ridiculous. Anyone but dwarves would have needed to find a chiropractor in Laketown. :p

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: